|
Do Objective Linear Model
based Systems work?
Just ask the Boston Red
Sox .
On October 27 when the
Boston Red Sox ended a generation long loosing streak to win the world
series, few expected it. One person however expected it and knew the
probabilities were in Boston’s favor even before the season started. That
person was John W. Henry the new owner of the of the Boston Red Sox.
The reason John W Henry
could be confident in the Red Sox prospects of winning the world series is
because he used an Objective Linear Model Based System to rebuild the Boston
team from the day he bought it. On October 27 2004 we saw the results of Mr.
Henry’s effort.
Applying systems to his
ventures is not new to Mr. Henry, he founded John W. Henry and Company,
Inc., in 1981. He applied his first Objective Linear Model based System to
commodities trading with the JWH Original Program. According to Mr. Henry
“We began trading our program, the JWH Original Program, in 1981 and this
was after quite a bit of research into the practical aspects of a basic
philosophy of what drives markets.”
“ That approach-a
mechanical and mathematical system – has not really changed at all. Yet the
system continues to be successful today, even though there has been
virtually no change in it over the last 18 years.”
By now most people know that John W. Henry
is the owner of the 2004 World Champion
Boston Red Sox baseball team.
John W. Henry's claim to fame (and
fortune), however, was and still is as a trend following trader. Michael
Covel profiles John's trading and baseball prowess in his book
Trend Following.

Red Sox Owner
John W. Henry Watching His Players' Workout
Boston Globe Staff Photo / Jim Davis

Red Sox Team After World Series Win

Red Sox Win
Moneyball by Michael Lewis
A great book on baseball and trading is
Moneyball by Michael Lewis.

From a recent interview with Tom Gardner,
the author of Moneyball Michael Lewis offers:
"Well, Moneyball is about how the
Oakland A's, on a low budget, win so many baseball games. The way they've
done it is by finding value in players that other people have overlooked.
And the way they do that is actually rather complicated. It involves a
sophisticated and, in some cases, original use of baseball statistics to
measure a player's performance. What they've had to do in Oakland, out of
economic necessity since they are a small-market team, is to question all
the traditional statistics that get used to evaluate players. They've
challenged the traditional measures, asking if they really are a good way to
measure what a particular guy brings to a team and how much he contributes
to winning. Believe it or not, the answer in most cases is "no" --
traditional measures are not very accurate...What academics say about the
stock market is that you can't find any opportunities. That the market is
efficient and therefore all value is appropriately priced. There is some
truth to that, but only some truth. I think the reason that Moneyball
resonated so much with stock market investors is that the asset that the
Oakland A's are evaluating, baseball players, is just like any other asset,
like stocks. And naturally one would think that the value of baseball
players would be perfectly understood by now. After all, this sport has been
around for 100 years. You've had generations of experts who think they know
what they're doing, writing articles teaching people how to value these
players. The players have statistics attached to their every move...Well,
here's exactly what I shouldn't do: give you a gut-feel answer. But my gut
tells me that the market for baseball players is more inefficient, only
because I've been around money managers for years. I worked in that
business, the money business...I don't think the stock market or any market
is perfectly efficient. A market is a human construct. It's made up of human
beings making decisions in the way human beings make decisions. And that's
as true of the stock market as of any other market. Human beings often make
irrational decisions. Those who can see through that irrationality and
emotion have and will always have an opportunity for superior returns."
Michael Lewis
Today, John W. Henry
manages over two billion dollars in client assets and He owns the world
series winning Boston Red Sox. Booth are the results of studding his
market, developing models and testing these models in endless simulations
until he arrived at results He was comfortable with. Next he applied these
systems and achieved the success he sought. |